Monday, April 22, 2013

Difficult Time Handling Ringing in ears? Read through These ...

Description:

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]

Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Some people might find prescription medication valuable. Exactly the same medicines that effectively handle despression symptoms and stress and anxiety can offer enhancements for tinnitus symptoms. Request your doctor if these drugs will work inside your condition. You are able to set a prescribed medication together with treatment methods like biofeedback to improve your results. In case your physician is letting you know that the tinnitus is untreatable, you have to speak to one more medical professional. This will likely isolate the music vibrations and end out any sound that you?re ability to hear currently. When you arrive the volume as well deafening, your listening to are affected more harm. Make yourself a relaxed sleeping regimen every night.Ringing in the ears may affect peoples? potential to reach sleep at night and stay in bed. A calming bed time routine can really help you to get a excellent night?s sleep at night. This should help you chill out and keep your blood pressure. Try and get adequate sleep, workout, and healthy food items. Get no less than 8-10 hrs of relaxing rest each night, eat healthful foods without excess several times per day and have a health and fitness strategy. Those who have ringing in the ears handle it far better when they are wholesome. In spite of the ringing in ears, consuming possession of your respective health implies recovering control over your entire lifestyle. Try and decrease your life.If you can to accomplish this, you can find your self a lot less seriously influenced by your condition. Create a relax bed time regimen that you can do evening. Ringing in ears can affect peoples? capacity to get to rest and remain sleeping. A restful bedtime can really help you to get a excellent night?s rest. This helps you loosen up and it also brings down hypertension lower. Attempt to keep away from anxiety, to assist with the tinnitus signs or symptoms personal loan . Make an effort to reduce unneeded tension through your existence, then find a chance to loosen up. Tinnitus is really a illness however it is an issue that triggers frustration and can impact your daily life. There are lots of various root leads to for tinnitus. This doesn?t mean it could not manage tinnitus. The following tips may help you deal with your tinnitus better. Usually do not allow ringing in ears as you at home. If it is way too very much, place a fan in your rooms, or some form of white-noise equipment. In case you have a great noise in your bedrooms, your ringing in the ears may only trouble you if you are out of the house and too preoccupied to be worried. A sonic cushion came to be with all the goal of ringing in the ears. This cushion was experimented with by troopers who injury up affected by ringing in the ears through the war and came residence with hearing ringing. A mass manufacturing design might shortly by made available to most people. A sonic pillow was created that can help decrease the signs of ringing in the ears. This cushion was experimented with by soldiers who injury up struggling with ringing in ears during the conflict and whom came back property with hearing ringing. A volume generated design is near to being offered to most people. Find out more about the appears to be you have with your ringing in ears. Read up on tinnitus, and speak with medical professionals about this. Anxiety follows fear, so reduce oneself of these debilitating aspects as a way to operate towards a successful recovery. Having a history noise from stereo or tv can assist you concentrate on groundwork or organization duties, but it is proven to be of help to ringing in ears victims. Ringing in the ears is truly the reaction to a person?s ability to hear simply being in contact with machinery disturbances, including aircraft, equipment or noisy construction job. If this kind of coverage is part of the daily work, put money into some little earplugs to guard yourself. To assist you handle ringing in ears on an daily schedule, tend not to endure by itself. For example, compare your condition to owning to listen to a horrible sound, or the method that you can?t check out a actually noisy show with out hearing plugs. This will aid them to recognize how they can support you when you deal with tinnitus, and help your loved ones understand what it seems like to have with ringing in the ears. Make an effort to recall whether you commenced any new drugs about the same time frame your ringing in the ears signs or symptoms started out. Numerous drugs might cause ringing in the ears, to be able swap prescription drugs and remove the ringing inside your the ears. If possible, along with your physician?s attention, attempt stopping every drug individually for the 7 days to find out if your listening to difficulties also quit. If you want to allow yourself respite from ringing in the ears, you should think about getting points within your surroundings which might be leading to they signs and symptoms or which makes them even worse. Some stimulant drugs to take into account staying away from are coffee, coffee, along with contra ?inflamed pain-killer. Be mindful that the daily stress could be even more compared to they as soon as were. If you have a great deal of stress, including the most minimal of discomforts can be exacerbated.You can expect to feel good prepared to handle your tinnitus if you aren?t so stressed about other difficulties. To deal with ringing in the ears, be sure you have individuals around who value you and also support you. For example, compare your trouble to getting to hear a horrible seem, or maybe the noisy noises of any party when you are seeking to rest. This makes it which means you won?t must experience all by yourself, and you may sense a lot more linked. You just might acquire medication for the tinnitus struggling. Exactly the same prescription drugs that efficiently treat depression and stress and anxiety have been shown to assist ease tinnitus signs and symptoms.Question your medical professional if these drugs might help your circumstances. You really should think about including treatment with option treatment solutions like biofeedback to improve your results. Do something to make sure you will never get ringing in ears. There are many methods for you to deal with it, and a few techniques to avoid it. So use the information and facts out of this post to enable you to approach working with ringing in ears when it is bugging you. Are you ready to understand more about how to approach ringing in ears alternatively? This can be an issue that holds true. Ringing in ears typically isn?t linked to a pathological conditions. Tinnitus isn?t entertaining, but there?s no need to enter into worry mode. This directs seem into the ears to terminate out any you could have been ability to hear from the inside.When you generate the amount as well high in volume, your hearing may suffer much more harm.

Source: http://ashlandshakespearereview.com/difficult-time-handling-ringing-in-ears-read-through-these-guidelines/ashland-news

project x the lorax lorax fisker karma super tuesday states shepard fairey is snooki pregnant

OpEdNews - Article: American Education

A Symptom of a Failed System

The Atlanta Public Schools cheating scandal finally brings to light what I saw coming years ago. I had predicted that the whole concept of Standardized Testing would lead? inevitably to cheating, not only on the part of the victimized student but on the part of teachers, principals and even administrations. The temptation proved to be too great.?

An investigation by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation released in July 2011 found that 44 out of 56 schools cheated on state-administered standardized tests. More than 150? teachers and principals confessed to have fixed incorrect answers on test papers. Their excuse was that the pressure to "meet targets" set by administrations with the threat of? negative evaluation or termination if they did not was simply too great. And it's not just Atlanta. We now find ourselves reading newspaper headlines like: ?

Massive Cheating Scandal? Rock Schools Nationwide

Is it any wonder then that, of the top 50 countries rated by the Economist Intelligence Unit, American education ranks a dismal 17 th. ?But, the sorry truth is that scandals like? these are just symptoms of a greater and more devastating disease. We are faced with a failed system not only in its function, but more importantly in its purpose. ? ? ? ?

With three of ten high school and four of ten college freshmen failing to graduate, our educational system is obviously failing. The question to be asked is not why the drop-outs? have failed in our educational system, but why the educational system has failed in its obligation to the drop-outs. To answer this question we must first arrive at a revised? understanding of the purpose of education. ? In reviewing ?popular remedies for the alarming drop-out rate, the question of why we educate must be addressed before we can? consider any rational question of how. ?Rarely, if ever, is the question of why addressed or even mentioned. It is simply assumed that the purpose is, first and foremost, that it will? lead to a higher income. Then there is the societal advantage of an orderly and stable status quo. This whole approach ignores what should be the true purpose of an education.

Education should be designed to provide opportunities for individual self-fulfillment. Indeed, the current system leans more to indoctrination than to education. It is a system? designed to meet the needs of the society as opposed to one that meets the personal needs of the individual student. ? It becomes a system designed to equip the corporate? world and its bottom-line mentality with an adequate work force and to provide society, with its questionable objectives a sufficient number of sycophants to maintain social? stability. What its purpose should be is to equip the student with an adequate means of gratifying his potential for personal achievement and fulfillment in concert with what innate? talents he may possess, This is the only source of true happiness. A truly just society should be one that addresses the needs of its individual citizens, as opposed to the needs of? a society that in turn ignores those individual needs. The creation of a society that allows for each individual the maximum possibly fulfillment and happiness, should, therefore, be? the broader aim and purpose of education. ?

Another significant danger of the present system is that it seems to have forsaken Socrates. For Socrates, the mere passing on and acceptance of traditional thought and? practice, which is what most of the current curricula consists of, is not education. Not only does such a practice tend to suppress the innate curiosity the first grader brings to? class, but it discourages the critical thinking that Socrates insisted must lie at the very foundation of education. Add to this the fact that in our modern world, the inability to think? critically will ultimately cause humanitarian advancement to lag dangerously behind technological advancement, ignoring the need for adequate ethical checks and balances? necessary to insure a safe and intelligent progression. Unfortunately with the current system, critical thinking on the part of the student, is actually suppressed because it r epresents a threat to the teacher's commandment from above to simply impart knowledge in compliance with standard objectives to be measured by the accursed standardized? testing. One amazing thought is that, ironically, this could lead us to recognize the necessity of asking why before we consider asking how.

So, where do we begin? The first step may be to identify and hold accountable those responsible for the failure. Unfortunately, the decisions for education in the present system? are made by two professional practitioners, educators and politicians. The system works this way. The educators, who are nothing more than graduates of the failed system, are? pressured and threatened by the politicians who know nothing about education, but who provide the necessary funding. This is a prescription for continued failure. To even begin a?

complete overhaul, which the situation demands, our public school system, one of Americas great promises, must be reclaimed by the public. This will prove most difficult because? this same public, is unfortunately also a product of the system. It must realize, for the sake of their deprived children, that the true purpose of education is to provide them with? the opportunity to fulfill their intrinsic desires rather than to indoctrinate them into a neurotic society. There can be no other source for their true happiness.

Source: http://www.opednews.com/articles/American-Education-by-Hal-O-Leary-130420-287.html

the patriot hall of fame occupy dc ufc 143 fight card my fair lady conversion disorder the chronicle

Sunday, April 21, 2013

Public defender to represent Dzhokhar Tsarnaev

By Ross Kerber

BOSTON (Reuters) - The Federal Public Defender Office said Saturday it will represent Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings, once charges are filed.

Miriam Conrad, head of the Boston office that represents criminal suspects who cannot afford a lawyer, said via email that "we have been informed that we will be appointed after charges are filed."

The pending appointment came as some Republicans called for the suspect to be tried with fewer rights, which could lead to a battle over the legal process.

Conrad said she could not give more details.

But a source close to the investigation, speaking on condition of anonymity, said officials hoped to file charges against Tsarnaev later on Saturday.

The source said the 19-year-old was shot in the throat and had tongue damage.

Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick said Tsarnaev's condition was serious. "He's not yet able to speak," Patrick told reporters on Saturday.

The suspect was captured Friday night and remained hospitalized under guard in Boston. Another official in Conrad's office, Charles McGinty, said earlier on Saturday that its attorneys have not spoken to Tsarnaev and will have to be appointed to represent him by a federal judge.

"That's why we're trying to advance the appointment to be as soon as possible," he said.

In Washington, several Republicans lawmakers called on the Obama administration to try Tsarnaev as an "enemy combatant" under terms of war, without rights such as the appointment of counsel.

"The accused perpetrators of these acts were not common criminals attempting to profit from a criminal enterprise, but terrorists trying to injure, maim, and kill innocent Americans," Senators John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire, and Representative Peter King of New York said in a statement.

Authorities did not read the teenager the Miranda warning usually given by police to criminal suspects before they are interrogated so statements can be admissible in court.

A Justice Department official said the government is invoking the public safety exception to Miranda to question the suspect extensively about other potential explosive devices or accomplices and to gain critical intelligence.

The Republican lawmakers praised that decision and also said they were encouraged that a so-called high-value detainee interrogation team was involved in the investigation.

The group was created after President Barack Obama ordered the shutdown of a CIA program in which militant suspects were held in a network of secret prisons during the administration of President George W. Bush.

(Additional reporting by Mark Hosenball and Vicki Allen in Washington; Editing by Doina Chiacu)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/u-public-defender-boston-seeks-represent-bomb-suspect-182116594.html

NBA Playoffs 2013 Boston Police Scanner Jeff Bauman Boston.com Oblivion Boston Bomber Canelo vs Trout

Saturday, April 20, 2013

Erika Eichelberger: House of Horrors

Violence on the Home Front

Cross-posted with TomDispatch.com

Since the Newtown massacre, visions of unfathomable crazy mass killers and armed strangers in the night have colonized the American mind. Proposed laws have been?drawn up?that would keep potential mass murderers from getting their hands on assault weapons and high-capacity clips, or that would stop hardened criminals from buying guns. But the danger out there is both more mundane and more terrible:?you're more likely to be hurt or killed by someone you know or love. And you'll probably be at home when it happens.

Between 2005 and 2010,?60% of all violent injuries?in this country?were inflicted by loved ones or acquaintances. And?60% of the time?those victimizations happened in the home. In 2011,?79%?of murders reported to the FBI (in which the victim-offender relationship was known) were committed by friends, loved ones, or acquaintances. Of the 3.5 million assaults and murders against family members between 1998 and 2002 (the last time such a study was done),?almost half?were crimes against spouses.?Eleven percent?were against children. But the majority of violent deaths are self-imposed. Suicide is the?leading cause?of violent death in the U.S., and?most?of those self-killings happen at home.

Violence Against Women

Vanette has plastic, rose-tinted glasses on and cowrie shells weaved into her braids. Her nails are long and thick and painted purple-brown. She has ample gaps in her teeth, and she's sitting at the communal dining table at a ?transitional home? in Washington, D.C., telling me about the time her boyfriend broke her knee.

Vanette doesn't really think of that as domestic violence, though. "When I think of physical violence, I think of punchin' and smackin'," she says. The fat silver chain bracelets on her wrists jangle against the table as she talks. Besides, she says, she was the one who started the fight. Her boyfriend had polyps in his lungs and was supposed to carry around an oxygen tank, flush his lungs twice a week with a machine, and not smoke. One night in 2010, when Vanette got home, there he was, smoking weed in the living room with friends. "I was like, yeah, well, whatever, you're gonna kill yourself anyway." And then he shoved her over the back of the couch.

Domestic violence is the number one cause of injury to women. The incidents add up to more than all the rapes, muggings, and car accidents women experience each year. One out of every four women in the U.S. will be physically injured by a lover in her lifetime. That translates into a woman being assaulted every nine seconds in America. Immigrant women are beaten at higher rates than U.S. citizens, and African-American women are subjected to the most severe forms of violence. Not surprisingly, a shaky economy just makes these numbers worse.

And then there are the rapes. Over a lifetime, one out of every six American women is raped. For Native Americans, that number is one in three. For Native Alaskans, it can be up to 12 times the national rate.

And don?t forget the killings. Sixty-four percent of the women killed every year are murdered by family members or lovers. There are more than 1,000 homicides of that kind annually, or approximately three a day. If there?s a gun in a home where domestic abuse is a common thing, a woman is eight times more likely to be killed.

Faced with this grim pile of data, the American home begins to look less like a ?castle? and more like a slaughterhouse.

At the same time, these numbers actually represent a vast improvement in domestic violence rates compared with a decade and a half ago.? Since 1994, the rate of violence against women in the home is down 64%.

That percentage isn't quite as dramatic as it looks, because it coincides with a parallel decline in overall violence during the same period, and excludes the homeless, up to 40% of whom report going to the streets or someone?s couch because of violence in the home. Still, the drop is significant and is likely due to, among other things, a public coming to terms with the reality of domestic violence, relatively recent federal laws meant to protect victims in the home, and the training of police and prosecutors to treat such violence as a crime, not a private affair.

For much of American history, the legal system didn't recognize most domestic violence, or date rape, or acquaintance rape, or marital rape as crimes. For a century, American men had the explicit right to beat their wives. They lost that right by the late 1870s, but long after that, the police would often respond to reports of wife-beatings by telling the husband to ?walk around the block? and cool off. Public aversion to acknowledging violence in the home was so intense for so long that the anti-animal cruelty movement preceded the anti-domestic violence movement of the 1960s and 1970s. Even today, a residual urge to respect the supposed sanctity of the home and marriage helps shield men from laws now on the books.

In 1994, Congress passed the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). It was a landmark in bringing domestic violence out of the house and into the public space. Among other things, it provided money for the legal representation of victims of domestic violence, and for police training on the subject, and it helped enforce judicial restraining orders. The law also funded states to adopt mandatory arrest policies, which require that police arrest suspects in cases in which there is probable cause to believe domestic violence has taken place. Such laws now exist in 22 states and the District of Columbia.

Nationwide, however, arrest rates for domestic violence remain low. Only about half of reported domestic violence incidents result in arrest.

Even when states do have mandatory arrest laws, they don?t always play out so well. If an arrest results in the elimination of the breadwinner in a household, it can leave an already battered woman broke as well. And the threat of certain punishment for a husband or boyfriend can actually make women reluctant to report abuse, which means they remain in violent homes. Immigrant and minority victims are even less inclined to call 911, since they have a stronger distrust of the police. Which means that sometimes mandatory arrest laws can backfire, resulting in fewer arrests, continued violence, and more deaths. A 2007 Harvard study found that the murder rate among domestic partners was 60% greater in states with mandatory arrest laws.

Once Vanette had landed on the floor behind the couch with one leg crumpled under her, it was her boyfriend who called 911. He was scared to death. When the ambulance came and the EMTs questioned her, she claimed it had been an accident. (Washington, D.C. has a mandatory arrest law). They kept her in the hospital for two days. And then she was on a cane. And out of a job. And shuttling between homeless shelters for months because her girlfriends told her she had to get out of that house.

Violence Against Children

Deon, who is now 27, doesn't cry. Ever. And he doesn?t get angry. His eyes are wide apart and impassive. He talks matter-of-factly about how, when he was 14, his mother tried to kill him. She said it was because he hadn?t done his homework. One day too many. She lashed him with an extension cord and threw a glass at him. She screamed that she'd call the police and then came at him with a knife. But she missed -- deliberately or accidentally -- and stabbed the wall instead. He says she meant to hit that wall. His little niece, his two sisters, and his mother?s boyfriend were all in the apartment. His older sister kept pleading, ?Mummy, that?s enough." But no one ever reported the incident.

Child Protective Services may not have gotten a call about Deon, but it does respond to millions of reports of alleged abuse: 3.4 million in 2011. There were 681,000 unique victims that year. Seventy-nine percent of those kids suffered from neglect at home. Eighteen percent were physically abused, and 9% were sexually abused. Babies under age one were assaulted most often; 1,570 of those children died from abuse and neglect that year. Eighty-two percent of child victims in 2011 were younger than four.

While the rate of assault on children (as with women) has dropped over the past two decades, a recent Yale School of Medicine study found that serious child abuse -- the kind that results in fractures, head injuries, burns, open wounds, or abdominal injuries -- is actually up.

Being poor is a good way to increase your chances of being hurt by your parents. The same Yale study of severe abuse found that over the past 12 years, parental punching, thrashing, or burning of children has jumped by 15% for kids on Medicaid, the government health insurance program for families in poverty, but by 5% for the general population.?Another recent Yale study suggested that child Medicaid recipients were six times more likely to be victims of abuse than those not on Medicaid.

Kids in violent homes have sleeping, eating, and attention problems. They are generally more withdrawn, anxious, and depressed than children with parents who don't abuse them. A 2012 Harvard study of the brain scans of 200 people found that childhood abuse can be associated with damage to the brain's hippocampus, which plays a major role in short- and long-term memory. Such kids are also more vulnerable to chronic illnesses like heart disease and diabetes, leading some to call child abuse the tobacco industry of mental health. One National Institute of Justice study of 1,500 kids found that abused children were also more likely to become violent criminals.

Child abuse first received national attention in 1874, due to the case of Mary Ellen McCormack, a 10-year-old orphan in Manhattan's Hell's Kitchen who was abused by an adoptive mother. No laws then existed to keep parents from beating their children, so the case was brought to court by, yes, the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. ?I have now on my head two black-and-blue marks which were made by Mamma with the whip," McCormack testified, "and a cut on the left side of my forehead which was made by a pair of scissors in Mamma?s hand; she struck me with the scissors and cut me.?

The McCormack case spurred a reformers' crusade. In 1912, the U.S. Children's Bureau was created to research and publicize the issue of violence against children. After World War II, more research led to the system of child-abuse reporting we have now, in which various professionals -- doctors, teachers, daycare workers -- are required to report suspicions of abuse. Child Protective Services does screenings and investigations and has the power to remove a child from a home, if necessary.

Deon didn't have his day in court, but even if he had, research shows that, again and again, courts return abused children to parents with a history of violence. A 2005 study by the New England Research Institutes found that, even in states with laws that tilt against custody for an abusive parent, 40% of adjudicated wife-beaters got joint custody of children. The American Judges Association says that about 70% of wife-abusers are able to convince a court that the mother is unfit for sole custody. Nationwide, some 58,000 children a year are put back into the unsupervised care of alleged abusers after a divorce.

Deon left his mother?s apartment in Brooklyn at 18 and moved in with a coworker in Harlem. He visits his mother maybe once a year. Her place is windowless, wall-to-wall carpeted, and tight with too much furniture. He and his mother don't ever talk about what happened with the homework and the knife and the wall. When he stops by, he'll hover in her apartment for 20 minutes or so.? And then he has to leave.

Self-Violence

Mark was 25, handsome, rich, and smart. He had a trust fund and spent $10,000 of it a month. He was really popular -- there must have been 400 people at his funeral.

When Mark was a kid, his father once made him cry for not finishing a sandwich in a restaurant. He also showed him just how to treat his mother and younger brother, so that Mark would grow up to be a good bully, too. When he graduated from college, his dad insisted that he also go to law school. But he couldn't get in.

Mark started binge drinking at age 13. He had a history of getting into trouble (at school, with the law), but his dad was usually able to get him out of it -- until the bar fight that landed a guy in the hospital. A couple of weeks after that, Mark was drunk at his apartment and fighting with his girlfriend. His dad had given him a .38 revolver because he thought the upscale neighborhood Mark lived in was dangerous. He pulled out the gun and shot himself. In his eulogy, his dad told the congregation that Mark was trying to live up to him and couldn't do it.

Of the approximately 55,000 people each year who die a violent death in the United States, most -- like Mark -- take their own lives: about 38,000 annually. Suicide is the 10th leading cause of American death, behind cancer and heart attacks but ahead of car accidents. There is a suicide every 13.7 minutes. And 77% of the time, as in Mark's case, it happens at home. In 2010, the highest suicide rate was among 45- to 64-year-olds. Men kill themselves four times more often than women, whites more often than other races.

There are known contributors. Ninety percent of those who kill themselves have mental disorders. Many have physical pain. Being unemployed is associated with as much as a three-fold increased risk of death by suicide. Having a means of suicide in the home, like a gun, also makes it more likely to happen. In that sense, Mark killed himself in the most common way.

Often enough, suicides fail. Nearly one million people attempt suicide every year. In 2010, 464,995 people visited a hospital for injuries due to suicidal behavior. Even though men succeed in killing themselves more often, women attempt suicide three times as often as men. According to researchers, that?s because a woman is more likely to use the act as a cry for help, rather than to end her life.

Suicide is not a pretty thing to talk about. That's one reason why federal policy on suicide prevention is still in its infancy. A movement organized by the families and friends of victims began to build throughout the 1990s, however, and eventually got the attention of Surgeon General David Satcher. In 2001, he laid out the first national strategy for suicide prevention. But 12 years later, advocates say federal funding for suicide prevention and research is still insufficient.

Oddly enough, since the federal government instituted its response, suicide rates have been climbing. The national suicide rate had been on the decline for decades: between 1990 and 2000, it dropped from 12.5 to 10.4 deaths per 100,000. In the next decade, it started to rise again and stood at 12.1 per 100,000 in 2010.

Suicide is up. Severe child abuse is on the rise. Domestic violence is still the number one injurer of women. The classic notion of the home as a refuge, not an abattoir, seems more and more like a joke.

Feel free to cut through that dark alley on your way home. Or maybe just don't go home.

Erika Eichelberger is a senior editorial fellow at Mother Jones where she writes regularly for the website. She is also director of social media for TomDispatch. She has written for the Nation, the Brooklyn Rail, and Alternet.

[Note to readers: The names of the three victims portrayed in this piece have been changed.]

Follow TomDispatch on Twitter and join us on Facebook or Tumblr. Check out the newest Dispatch book, Nick Turse?s The Changing Face of Empire: Special Ops, Drones, Proxy Fighters, Secret Bases, and Cyberwarfare.

?

Follow Erika Eichelberger on Twitter: www.twitter.com/erika_eee

"; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, 'top', {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: 'clear-overlay'}); });

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/erika-eichelberger/violence-in-the-home_b_3109057.html

Don Grady ann curry euro 2012 Colorado Springs Nora Ephron mario balotelli mario balotelli

House passes pro-business cybersecurity bill

FILE - In this Oct. 8, 2012 file photo, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., left, and and the committee's ranking Democrat, Rep. C.A. "Dutch" Ruppersberger, D-Md., take part in a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington. Pro-business legislation aimed at helping companies fend off sophisticated foreign hackers sailed through the House on Thursday despite a White House veto threat and an outcry from privacy advocates and civil liberties groups that say it leaves Americans vulnerable to spying by the military. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

FILE - In this Oct. 8, 2012 file photo, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., left, and and the committee's ranking Democrat, Rep. C.A. "Dutch" Ruppersberger, D-Md., take part in a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington. Pro-business legislation aimed at helping companies fend off sophisticated foreign hackers sailed through the House on Thursday despite a White House veto threat and an outcry from privacy advocates and civil liberties groups that say it leaves Americans vulnerable to spying by the military. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

(AP) ? Pro-business legislation aimed at helping companies fend off sophisticated foreign hackers sailed through the House on Thursday despite a White House veto threat and an outcry from privacy advocates and civil liberties groups that say it leaves Americans vulnerable to spying by the military.

The House vote, 288-127, puts the spotlight on the Senate, which hasn't taken up the issue and is consumed with other high-profile issues such as gun control and immigration. The lack of enthusiasm in the Senate and objections by the White House mean that the legislation is in limbo despite an aggressive push by lobbyists representing nearly every corner of industry.

But supporters said they were gaining momentum: Despite the White House veto threat 92 Democrats voted for the measure, compared to only 42 for a similar bill last year.

The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, or CISPA, is widely backed by industry groups that say businesses are struggling to defend themselves against aggressive and sophisticated attacks from hackers in China, Russia and Eastern Europe.

Hackers haven't been able to deliver crippling blows to the U.S. economy or infrastructure, but they have been able to wreak havoc on some key commercial systems. Most recently several news outlets including the New York Times acknowledged that their systems had been penetrated, while banks are said to be quietly fighting daily intrusions. North Korea was recently held responsible for a cyberattack that shut down tens of thousands of computers and servers at South Korean broadcasters and banks.

The bill, said House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., strikes "that right balance between our privacy, civil liberties and stopping bad guys in their tracks from ruining what is one-sixth of the U.S. economy."

Under the legislation, businesses and the federal government would be able to share technical data without worrying about anti-trust or classification laws. The bill also would grant businesses legal immunity if hacked so long as they acted in good faith to protect their networks. The bill is sponsored by Rogers and Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger, D-Md., the panel's top Democrat.

But privacy advocates and civil liberties groups say the bill would open up Americans' most private online records to the federal government. The bill doesn't include a requirement that companies scrub data of sensitive information like health or credit records before sharing it with the government.

In its veto threat issued Tuesday, the White House echoed that concern.

"Citizens have a right to know that corporations will be held accountable ? and not granted immunity ? for failing to safeguard personal information adequately," the White House stated.

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., had tried to amend the bill to require companies to strip any data of personally identifiable information before sharing it with the government. But Republicans blocked his proposal from being debated on the floor because they said tough mandates might deter companies from participating.

Business groups say the privacy concern is overblown.

"When it comes to sharing, there are practical, business reasons why companies carefully protect" sensitive information, Tim Molino with the Business Software Alliance recently wrote in an online post urging lawmakers to pass the bill.

"At the end of the day, personal information is customer information, and maintaining trust with customers is a core business imperative," Molino added.

Privacy groups also objected to the bill because they said it would give the National Security Agency a front-row seat in analyzing data from private computer networks. The bill doesn't address the NSA's role specifically, but it's presumed that the military intelligence agency would have a central role in the data-sharing program because of its technical expertise in tracking foreign-based hackers.

Democratic Rep. Jan Schakowsky of Illinois had tried to amend the bill to prohibit the military from collecting threat data directly from industry. But that proposal also was blocked from floor debate amid GOP objections. Still facing a veto threat, Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, worked with Democrats on a measure that would ensure that companies go first through the Department of Homeland Security. While that proposal was adopted, the American Civil Liberties Group and others still were not satisfied.

"Cybersecurity can be done without sacrificing Americans' privacy online," Michelle Richardson, an ACLU legislative counsel, said after the vote.

A similar version of the bill passed the House a year ago by a 248-168 vote. But that bill also had prompted a veto threat and never gained traction in the Senate.

Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., voted against the bill last year but supported it this year, saying the latest version "represents a significant improvement." The second-ranking House Democrat said more work needed to be done to ensure that personally identifiable information is removed during cyberintelligence sharing, but praised the move to put the Department of Homeland Security, rather than military agencies, in charge of receiving the information.

In February, Obama signed an executive order that would help develop voluntary industry standards for protecting networks. But the White House and Congress agreed that legislation was still needed to address the legal liability companies face if they share threat information. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., promised at the time to advance a bipartisan proposal "as soon as possible," although one hasn't emerged.

Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, is expected to take the lead on cybersecurity proposals that would likely address the issue of information sharing but also take up other issues including ways to improve research and development.

In a statement after the vote, Rockefeller said the House action was important, "even if CISPA's privacy protections are insufficient." He said he would work with Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., on bills covering various aspects of cybersecurity. "There is too much at stake," he said, "for Congress to fail to act."

___

Associated Press writer Jim Abrams contributed to this report.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/89ae8247abe8493fae24405546e9a1aa/Article_2013-04-18-US-Cybersecurity-Legislation/id-3961f4b295584e2990fc98e864065c84

Claire Danes Amy Poehler Australian Open Girls Hbo Golden Globes homeland homeland

Friday, April 19, 2013

Google's 1Q shows more progress in mobile ads

FILE- This April 12, 2012, photo shows a Google logo on a window at the company's headquarters in Mountain View, Calif. Google's latest quarterly results reported Thursday, April 18, 2013 provided further proof that the Internet search leader is figuring out how to make more money as Web surfers migrate from personal computers to mobile devices. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma, File)

FILE- This April 12, 2012, photo shows a Google logo on a window at the company's headquarters in Mountain View, Calif. Google's latest quarterly results reported Thursday, April 18, 2013 provided further proof that the Internet search leader is figuring out how to make more money as Web surfers migrate from personal computers to mobile devices. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma, File)

(AP) ? Google's latest quarterly results provided further proof that the Internet search leader is figuring out how to make more money as Web surfers migrate from personal computers to mobile devices.

The first-quarter numbers released Thursday show that a recent decline in Google's average ad prices is easing. That's an indication that marketers are starting to pay more for the ads that Google distributes to smartphones and tablet computers. The company expects that trend to continue as it changes its pricing system and as mobile devices emerge as the most effective way to reach consumers.

In another encouraging sign, the Motorola cellphone business was less of a burden than it has been since Google bought it for $12.4 billion nearly a year ago.

Meanwhile, Google's core operations, such as Internet search, maps, video and email, remain reliable moneymakers.

Those factors, coupled with an unusually low tax rate, produced earnings that exceeded analyst estimates and pleased investors. Google's stock gained $11.84, or 1.6 percent, to $777.75 in extended trading Thursday after the report came out.

As with most major technology companies, Google's future success is likely to hinge on its ability to adjust to an accelerating shift from computers controlled by keyboards and mice to mobile devices that respond to the touch of a finger and are usually within a person's reach.

Google has been among the companies leading the transition, thanks to the Android software that it has been giving away to device makers since 2008. Android is now the leading mobile operating system. Most device makers using Android also prominently feature Google's services, giving the company more opportunities to sell ads.

Even so, the mobile upheaval has presented Google with challenges that have been worrying investors, despite the company's steadily rising earnings.

Mobile ads so far have fetched less money than those viewed on the larger screens of laptop and desktop computers. Google's average price, or the "cost per click" to advertisers, has fallen from the previous year in six consecutive quarters, including the first three months of the year.

Now, there are signs that marketers are starting to pay more for mobile ads. The first-quarter decrease in average ad prices was just 4 percent. By comparison, Google's average ad price fell by 6 percent during the final three months of last year and by 12 percent during last year's first quarter.

"I have been very pleased with the rate of progress so far," CEO Larry Page said during a conference call with analysts. "In today's multiscreen world, the opportunities are endless."

Google's ambitions sometimes seem boundless, too, as the Mountain View, Calif., company continually pushes the technological envelope. This week alone, Google unveiled plans to expand its effort to provide extraordinarily fast Internet access into Provo, Utah and began distributing test versions of Internet-connected glasses to programmers who paid $1,500 apiece for a device that is supposed to be the equivalent of a smartphone that can be worn on a person's head.

Those projects are examples why Google's spending often runs higher than investors prefer. The company's capital expenditures doubled from last year to $1.2 billion in the first quarter while research-and-development expenses rose 27 percent to $1.8 billion. Some of the increase was caused by Motorola, which Google didn't own in last year's first quarter.

By investing in new frontiers, Page believes Google will remain a fount of innovation. He doesn't want to allow Google's domination of Internet search to foster a sense of complacency that becomes the company's downfall.

"Companies can tend to get comfortable doing what they've always done, with a few minor tweaks," Page told analysts Thursday. "It's only natural to want to work on things you know, but incremental improvement is guaranteed to be obsolete over time, especially in technology where history has shown that there's a lot of revolutionary change."

As part of its effort to adjust to the mobile evolution, Google is changing the way it sells ads, prodding more marketers into buying spots on mobile devices at the same time they plan campaigns aimed at PCs. Although that switch isn't to be completed until late June, about 1.5 million ad campaigns on Google already have changed over to the more mobile-friendly format, according to Nikesh Arora, the company's chief business officer.

Google Inc. earned $3.3 billion, or $9.94 per share, during the first three months of the year. That was a 16 percent increase from $2.9 billion, or $8.75 per share, in the same period last year.

If not for certain expenses, Google said it would have earned $11.58 per share. That figure exceeded the average earnings estimate of $10.65 per share among analysts surveyed by FactSet.

Google's tax rate in the quarter was just 8 percent compared with 18 percent at the same time last year. Chief Financial Officer Patrick Pichette said the reduction stemmed from research and development tax credits and a change in the mix of income from overseas, where Google typically pay or no tax.

Revenue climbed 31 percent to $14 billion, from $10.6 billion a year earlier.

After subtracting advertising commissions, Google's revenue totaled $11 billion ? about $335 million below analyst estimates.

Motorola Mobility's operating loss in the first quarter was $179 million, the smallest setback so far under Google's ownership. Motorola Mobility has lost $1.25 billion since Google took control.

Google has been paring the losses by cutting jobs and shedding the part of Motorola Mobility that makes set-top boxes for cable television.

The company began laying off about 1,200 Motorola Mobility employees last month, adding to the 4,000 people that Google let go last year. Google also shed about 5,000 more workers Wednesday when it completed its $2.35 billion sale of the set-top business to Arris Group Inc. Google ended March with more than 38,700 workers in its core business and nearly 10,000 in the part of Motorola Mobility that it still owns.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/f70471f764144b2fab526d39972d37b3/Article_2013-04-18-Earns-Google/id-e0a31e02328c44a78a85ff7dff213d0d

London 2012 Track And Field Jordyn Wieber michael phelps Kerri Strug Ledecky Nadia Comaneci Rebecca Soni

Anger, fear, tears normal response to disasters

Kaitlyn Greeley, a clinical care tech at Tufts Medical Center in Boston, poses Thursday, April 18, 2013. Greeley, speaking about her emotional response in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombings said, "it's just a very isolated feeling, the world upside down. It just doesn't feel right yet." (AP Photo/Elise Amendola)

Kaitlyn Greeley, a clinical care tech at Tufts Medical Center in Boston, poses Thursday, April 18, 2013. Greeley, speaking about her emotional response in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombings said, "it's just a very isolated feeling, the world upside down. It just doesn't feel right yet." (AP Photo/Elise Amendola)

Kaitlyn Greeley, a clinical care tech at Tufts Medical Center in Boston, poses Thursday, April 18, 2013. Greeley, speaking about her emotional response in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombings said, "it's just a very isolated feeling, the world upside down. It just doesn't feel right yet." (AP Photo/Elise Amendola)

(AP) ? Kaitlyn Greeley burst into tears when a car backfired the other day. She's afraid to take her usual train to her job at a Boston hospital, walking or taking cabs instead. She can't sleep.

"I know this is how people live every day in other countries. But I'm not used to it here," said Greeley, 27, a technician at Tufts Medical Center who was on duty Monday when part of the hospital was briefly evacuated even as victims of the blast were being treated in the emergency room.

Anger, crying jags and nightmares are all normal reactions for both survivors of the Boston Marathon bombings and witnesses to the mayhem. While the injured and those closest to the blasts are most prone to psychological aftershocks, even people with no physical injuries and those like Greeley might feel the emotional impact for weeks afterward as they struggle to regain a sense of security. What's not clear is who will suffer lingering anxiety, depression or even post-traumatic stress disorder.

But specialists say that how resilient people are helps determine how quickly they bounce back. The resilient tend to be people who share their emotions before becoming overwhelmed, who know how to copewith stress, and who have the ability to look for a silver lining ? such as focusing on bystanders who helped the wounded.

Focusing on the horror, "that's harder on our body and our mind," said Dr. Catherine Mogil, co-director of the family trauma service at the University of California, Los Angeles. "People who tend to be able to make positive meaning out of tough situations are going to fare better."

Among the typical reactions that psychologists say anyone who witnessed the bombings or their aftermath might experience include difficulty sleeping or eating; sweats or stomachaches; anxiety or fear ? especially in crowded situations that remind people of the bombing. People may have a hard time focusing on work or other everyday activities. They may feel numb, anger easily, or cry often.

Priscilla Dass-Brailsford, a psychologist at Georgetown University Medical Center, said that if those symptoms don't fade in about a month, of if they are bad enough to impair function, people should seek help.

But for most, "time is a great healer," said Dass-Brailsford, who served on disaster mental health teams that counseled survivors of 9/11 in New York.

Specialists say only a small number of people are expected to be so severely affected that they develop PTSD, a disorder that can include flashbacks, debilitating anxiety, irritability and insomnia months after the trauma. Even among veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, the best estimate was that just under 20 percent returned with symptoms of PTSD or major depression.

More at risk for lingering psychological effects are people who've previously been exposed to trauma, whether from the battlefield, a car crash or a hurricane.

During two stints in Iraq as a Marine, Eusebio Collazo of Humble, Texas, was gravely wounded and today runs regularly to help deal with PTSD. Running with a veterans group called Team Red, White & Blue, he was at mile 25 of the marathon when the bombs detonated ? and adrenaline fueled his frantic race to find his wife, Karla, at the finish line. She was unharmed.

"My wife keeps asking me, 'I don't know how I should be feeling. I want to cry but I can't.' And then I want to cry, and I can't cry either. So, there's a lot of weird, different feelings going on," Collazo said Thursday. It's harder, he said, to handle explosions on the home front than in a war zone.

In Boston's hospitals, teams of counselors and social workers are telling patients and their families what to expect in the difficult days and weeks ahead.

"Most people are having a lot of flashbacks," and thoughts of the bombing interrupt their days and nights, said Lisa Allee, who directs the Community Violence Response Team at Boston Medical Center. "These are very typical, normal, expected emotions after any traumatic event or disaster."

Beyond hospitalized patients, part of coping is awareness about how to take care of the psyche ? turning off scary TV coverage and reading a book, going out for a quiet dinner, anything to temporarily cut the stress, says Dass-Brailsford, the disaster specialist.

That's especially true for parents who are trying to calm their children, added UCLA's Mogil, because kids take their emotional cues from the adults around them. Younger children especially don't need to see repeated footage of the blasts, because they may think it's happening again.

For a lot of people, psychiatrists say, talking about their experience can be cathartic.

A cashier's routine "how are you?" was enough for Anndee Hochman to tear up in a Philadelphia hardware store Wednesday. Hochman and her 12-year-old daughter had traveled to Boston to watch her partner run the marathon ? and all three were in different places when the bombs exploded, Hochman herself just a few blocks from the finish line.

Hochman spent 10 minutes telling the store clerk her family's story of reuniting ? and said it helps every time she's told friends, family, even a near-stranger about the experience.

Unknowingly, Hochman echoed the advice to look for a silver lining as she counseled daughter Sasha, who was nervous about returning to school.

"I reminded her, " 'Sweetie' ? and reminded myself, too ? 'there may have been a few people who planned those bombs and wanted to hurt people," Hochman said, "but there are so many more people there and in the world who want to help.'"

___

AP Medical Writer Lauran Neergaard reported from Washington. AP writer Kevin Freking contributed to this report.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/bbd825583c8542898e6fa7d440b9febc/Article_2013-04-19-Boston%20Marathon-Psychological%20Aftershocks/id-b0f235393db04a5191daa192e0bfc214

dodgers game of thrones Kevin Ware Google Nose success Cookies april fools day